Vance Accuses Judges Who Block Trump’s Executive Orders of Acting Illegally

Recently, President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser, John Vance, made headlines when he accused judges who block Trump’s executive orders of acting illegally. Vance, who served in the Trump administration from 2017 to 2018, made these remarks during a panel discussion on executive power and the judiciary at the Federalist Society’s National Lawyers Convention.

Vance’s comments come in the wake of several federal judges issuing injunctions against various executive orders signed by President Trump. These orders have targeted a wide range of issues, from immigration to environmental regulations to healthcare. In each case, the judges have ruled that the orders exceed the president’s authority or violate the Constitution.

In his remarks, Vance argued that these judges are overstepping their bounds and interfering with the president’s ability to carry out his duties. He claimed that the judiciary is meant to interpret the law, not create it, and that by blocking Trump’s executive orders, these judges are essentially legislating from the bench.

Vance’s comments have sparked controversy and drawn criticism from legal experts and scholars. Many have pointed out that it is well within the judiciary’s role to review and, if necessary, strike down executive orders that are unconstitutional or exceed the president’s authority. They argue that this system of checks and balances is essential to maintaining the rule of law and preventing the abuse of power by any branch of government.

Critics of Vance’s position also point out that the judiciary has a long history of reviewing and overturning executive actions that are found to be unlawful. This is a key part of the American system of government, which is designed to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful.

In the end, the debate over the legality of judges blocking Trump’s executive orders is likely to continue. It is a complex and contentious issue that goes to the heart of the balance of power between the branches of government. However, it is clear that the role of the judiciary in reviewing and interpreting the law is a vital part of our democracy, and one that should not be undermined or dismissed lightly.